Yesterday, February 16, 2018, once again a Southern California Freeway, the 10 Freeway in Rialto, was the venue for a horrible and devastating fiery trucking accident which resulted in the wrongful death of five innocent individuals, and injuring another. A concrete truck careened through the center divider and crashed into multiple vehicles. The crash happen around 1:00 p.m. in Rialto, close to Riverside Avenue. The concrete truck was on the westbound. The accident involved four cars, a truck and the concrete truck. The heavy toll, in terms of loss of human lives, in the California Freeways is unfortunately a daily occurrence where small vehicles huddle with heavy trucks in same travel lanes. It is time for the legislature to address this issue. The occupants of smaller vehicles in trucking accidents have a small chance of survival as they are no match for heavy trucks. Assigning specific lanes for trucks and designation of special hours of the day would certainly reduce the number of fatalities. Furthermore, reducing the speed limit for the truckers will no doubt be an added benefit in reducing the number of wrongful deaths in the California Freeways. At the minimum the center dividers must be reinforced to be able to withstand impacts by heavy trucks. Until then our California Freeways continue to be deadtraps, causing numerous wrongful deaths, devastating families of innocent drivers and their passengers. These issues are continually litigated by wrongful death attorneys and trial lawyers in the California courts in an effort to recompense the family members of the decedents whose lives were wrongfully taken due to the negligent truckers and the inadequate roadways and regulations.
Illegal street racing has become a common practice in the streets of Southern California; unfortunately, too many of said races result in accidents causing property damage, bodily injuries and even wrongful death. The city of Woodland Hills, which is in the north of part of Los Angeles, was witness to a multiple-vehicle accident yesterday November 1, 2016, in what appears to have been the result of an illegal street race. Fortunately, no deaths resulted from said accident; however, several people sustained injuries and had to be transported to a nearby hospital. One of the vehicles involved, a 2015 McLaren 650S Spider worth over $300,000, which can reach speeds of over 200 mph, was totaled. It is incredible that no fatalities resulted from this wreck in light of witnesses account of 70 to 80 mph crash in a 25 mph school zone. The same cannot be said for the street racing in Woodland Hills on June 27, 2016 which resulted in multiple fatalities.
An illegal form of auto racing street racing on public roads commonly results in wrongful death of not only the drivers but often innocent bystanders. Just today, November 2, 2016, a street racing crash involving a twenty-three-year-old and 17-year old teenager resulted in the death of a three-year old girl in Philadelphia.
History tells the story of how three American companies began to produce muscle cars, high performance cars, to boost sales to youths, and due to lack legal racing tacks, public streets became the de facto venue for racing, hence the term "street-racing". It is believed that modern street racing is rooted in Woodward Avenue, Michigan, in the 1960s.
Victims of street racing wrongful death should promptly contact a competent experienced wrongful death attorney due to the complexity of the legal issues associated with street racing wrongful deaths, i.e. insurance companies refuse to pay damages for wrongful deaths caused by street-racing crashes arguing such deaths are the consequences of intentional reckless disregard for human life for which their insureds are not covered under their insurance policies. In other words insurance companies only pay damages for wrongful deaths caused by the negligence of their insureds and not by their intentional recklessness. Therefore, it is imperative to contact a seasoned wrongful death attorney to adequately investigate the facts surrounding a street-racing crash.
Automobile accidents are so common in Southern California that they hardly make the news, even when a wrongful death is involved, but this time was different, the worse deadly accident in California's history in so many decades with 13 dead and 31 injured. Who is to blame? No doubt the bus driver was negligent (unless he had a heart attack), he was careless and not paying adequate attention to the road and his driving. Alternatively he may have been reckless, sleeping, speeding, or even drunk driving, and thus acted with complete disregard for the safety of his passengers. However as in so many wrongful death cases other invaluable evidence comes to fore when a competent wrongful death attorney gets involved to pursue the wrongful death claims of the decedents' immediate relatives and families.
The accident was caused when the USA Holiday tour bus carrying passengers returning from a casino near the Salton Sea rammed into the rear of a semitrailer on the way home to Los Angeles. So what was the semitrailer doing at the time? It was apparently moving at a much lower speed than the tour bus. Why? The CHP officers had been slowing and stopping the traffic so that a Southern California Edison work crew could complete electrical wiring which had to cross the road way, i.e. the 10 Freeway. Probing into the cause of the accident, a capable and seasoned wrongful death attorney would diligently scrutinize the legal duty of care and whether it was breached by anyone else including the semitrailer driver, the CHP officers, and/or the Southern California Edison work crew, each of whom may have possibly contributed to the tour bus driver's negligence thus resulting in so many wrongful deaths and so many suffering from serious personal injuries. Consequently, a wrongful death trial lawyer's timely involvement is essential to the families of the victims who seek justice for the death of their loved ones.
Under the law monetary compensation is the only remedy for negligent wrongful act of a person or organization which has resulted in injury or death. The intent of the law is to make the victims whole again, in terms of money damages, however if the insurance policy of the tour bus is inadequate, which is most likely the case with 13 dead and 31 injured, reasonable attribution of liability to others, persons or entities, who may be determined to have had contributed to the cause of the accident may bring about an expeditious legal resolution to the wrongful death and personal injury claims.
Can iPhone cause brain injury? The brain injury or brain cancer concern is on the minds of many iPhone users (more so with people who suffer from a degenerative brain disease or cancer) as iPhone (cell phone) usage has increased dramatically year over year. The pressing issue surrounds electric magnetic frequency (EMF) generated by iPhone. EMF is all around us and we are all expose to it. We cannot see EMF, as it is an invisible radiation, and even if we could see it we cannot avoid it. EMF is strongest and most intense at the source of emission, i.e. iPhone, cell towers, radio antennas, etc. It is well established however that an uninterrupted exposure to high frequency EMFs, such as x-rays and gamma rays is cancer causing. These type of high frequency EMFs are ionizing radiation and thus can cause damage to cells and DNA. So what kind of EMF is transmitted by iPhone? The answer is non-ionizing radiation. It is widely believed that non-ionizing radiation is not cancer causing. If the belief was otherwise the whole world would enter a hysterical spin that it could probably never recover from. Why? Because many instruments that we regularly use and rely on in our daily lives emit non-ionizing radiation, for example power lines, computer, radio antenna, TV broadcast antenna, WiFi, microwave antenna, and yes even iPhone and other cell phones are all non-ionizing EMF devices. "Ion" is a molecule or atom that can gain or lose more electrons thus creating a net electric charge. "Ionization" is the process by way of which an atom or molecule gains or loses electrons thus acquiring a negative or positive charge. "Non-ionizing" EMF is a radiation that does not carry adequate energy to ionize an atom or molecule, i.e remove or add electrons to an atom or molecule.
Over the past 15 years studies have failed to link cancer conclusively with the use of cell phones, although there are some studies that suggest that there may be a link between glioma (type of brain cancer), and heavy use of cell phones. A more recent study by Dr. Igor Yakmenko of The National Sciences of Ukraine suggest that radio frequency exposure results in oxidative stress which he claims could cause Parkinson's and Alzheimer's, even headaches and skin irritation. Oxidative stress is a process that is claimed to be directly linked to degenerative diseases.
The 13 country INTRPHONE study suggested the possibility of increased risk of glioma, a type of brain cancer, but could not definitely conclude that it is probable. The Danish study which considered about 400,000 people during 13 years concluded that cell phone use cannot be associated with an increased risk of brain tumors. Also in United Kingdom a study which covered 800,000 women during a seven year period did not find any link between cell phone use and brain tumors. Nevertheless one organization the World Health Organization (WHO) has classified Radio Frequency field as "possibly carcinogenic to humans", which includes cell phones. However none of the agencies in the United States has declared that use of cell phones could cause cancer or brain injury.
So until such a day that there are more conclusive studies, there are no indications that long term use of cell phones is cancer causing or could cause brain injuries. But it never hurts to be cautious and careful, so use of hand free devices is recommended.
Police misconduct can cause wrongful death. Wrongful death in the context of police misconduct happens when a police officer unlawfully or negligently fires his or her gun and as a result causes the death of a person. The usual pattern is a police officer uses his or her gun intentionally but unreasonably, usually as a result of subjective (not objective) concern for his or her own safety and/or safety of others. Often the issue is whether a lesser force could have been used to stop the transgressor, in other words was the use of a gun legally justified. It is axiomatic that police misconduct can take a hefty toll on the society as a whole. Not only the family members of the decedent suffer unimaginable sorrow, but also any payment to the victim's family, either through settlement or jury verdict award, is paid by the tax payers. As such, with the popular use of recording devices police misconduct has become the subject of intense public scrutiny. In some countries such as United Kingdom police officers do not carry guns. However, in the United Kingdom gun sale to the public is unlawful and therefore it is most unlikely that a police officer would be faced with a person who is armed. In contrast in the United States the second amendment guarantees the right to bear arms, therefore the solution is not banning the sale of guns in the United States, nor is it to stop police officers from carrying guns.
A relevant issue that is the subject of the public conversation is police use of racial profiling. It has been argued that racial profiling is a by product of policing the public no matter how much training and supervision are afforded the police, and consequently it is more likely than not that a police officer would invoke the use of his or her gun in a police pursuit or a traffic stop when racial profiling is employed by the police officer to assess the situation. It has been widely reported that minorities are afflicted with the brunt of police misconduct i.e. abuse of firearm. Some argue that it is not because of the racial profiling that minorities are more likely the subject of police misconduct, but rather in the poverty stricken communities crime is more prevalent and consequently the more police presence, a recipe for more errors and mistakes. Such posturing supposes a factual premise that more and more minorities continue to live and do live in poverty afflicted communities. So what is the solution? It has been suggested that leaders of the nation, those in the government and the private sector, must do more to remove poverty from the afflicted communities. The logic behind this proposition is that crime is more widespread in poverty stricken communities, and that by removing the poverty, arguably there will be a reduction in crime, and consequently a reduction in the concomitant police profiling as well. However removing poverty from society has been the goal of every society since perhaps time immemorial. Perceivably the most successful in this regard are perhaps the socialist countries of Scandinavia. Socialist societies pay heavy taxes to carry the burden of the less fortunate, an ideology that is frowned on in the United States - not the helping of the less fortunate but the "heavy taxes." One would think that an extraterrestrial being visiting planet earth would possibly conclude that on planet earth societies, in most part of the world including the United States, are segregated by those who "have" and those who "have-not", and that the law's main purpose is to protect the "haves" from the "have-nots." A cynical and simplistic world view, but nonetheless a thought provoking one. Not all people are born with equal opportunities and some humans have immutable physical characteristics that unfortunately makes them the target of prejudice by the less educated (not in terms of schooling but rather in terms of understanding). People are created as equals and must be treated as equals, yet somehow application of this simple truth runs afoul. It has in the past and it will in the future until such a day that humans realize that they should not compete with one another by way of prejudice but rather work with one another to give a helping hand to the less fortunate among us. Until such a day when we all can get along and live happily, the remedy prescribed by law in police misconduct cases is wrongful death litigation, i.e. suing the responsible person and/or entity for monetary damages, with the intent that such damages would alleviate the sorrow of the victims' family and furthermore be a deterrent for the police not to commit the same wrong again.
Physicians know that their first goal is to make sure their patients are not in any discomfort, and that they are treated in the best manner possible. Unfortunately, whether due to accidents, mistakes, or miscommunication, many people either die or encounter more health problems due to medical malpractice. This is becoming such a common problem that patients know sue their doctors, the hospital, and sometimes the staff as well for pain and suffering. These malpractice lawsuits have become so commonplace, that many doctors will actually just settle the problem out of court, or even offer patients monetary compensation up front before the problem worsens and escalates into a court-based lawsuit. Medical malpractice is now being integrated into the medical educational curriculum so that doctors can be aware of the implications, and so that they can be prepared and take precautions. Because of this new element in medical related education, those who are interested in the field must be made aware of the problems that have happened in the past and how they can keep it from happening to them.
A radio station responsible for the wrongful death of a woman who was acutely intoxicated by excessive water intake would be facing a multimillion dollars verdict. Although the jury has not yet decided the final outcome of the case, the plaintiff's lawyer in the case has asked for an award of $24 to $34 million dollars. Such an award would not be a deterrant nor is it intended to be a deterant against any future reckless conduct by the defendant or others similarly situated.
Only after more than 200 patients were overly radiated, more than 8 times the normal limit, did the Food and Drug Administration issue an alert last week warning hospitals across the country to check their CT protocols. Excessive radiation exposure increases the likelihood of cancer
At first glance it appeared that the $36.6 million settlement in the devastating apartment blaze would go a long way to compensate the victims. However most of the money is slated for the rebuilding of the two apartment buildings in Conshohocken’s riverfront. The serendipity of erecting new buildings after the horrific blaze will no doubt contribute to the successful revival of this aging town. Good fortune had it that the litigation resolved within months, or just little over a year.
It is of no surprise to trial attorneys that insurance companies hire the best experts to fight injury victims in court. However, this is not readily known to the general public who make the jury pool. A personal injury victim who has suffered serious injuries often finds herself in a courtroom with numerous insurance company experts - hired guns – whose job is to cast doubt on her injuries.
Jurors are heavily influenced by these deceptive experts. Returning unfavorable verdicts because their prejudices have been prayed on; creating a smoke screen to shield injured victims suffering from the juries consideration is the ultimate task for which heavy sums are paid by insurance companies - handsome rewards that guarantee repeated performance by the insurance company experts.
In 2009, a Senator from Wisconsin introduced much needed legislation to make tire defect information public. The objective of this bill is to shine light on both court rulings and out-of-court settlements that have had little or no publicity. Without public notifications, these potentially dangerous tires continue to pose a threat to unsuspecting consumers. Although the public generally hears about the most well known tire defects, a surprising large percentage of tire defects and the injuries that they have already caused go virtually unnoticed. The hidden danger for consumers is enormous!
The "Sunshine Act in Litigation" will require courts to put public safety first when deciding on claims against the manufacturers of defective tires. Without this legislation, the courts can (and currently do) issue a protective order that keeps consumers and consumer advocacy groups from accessing vital information about defective tires. The courts also have the right to seal the records of these court cases, thus keeping people who already own the defective tires from finding out that they are at risk daily. Of course, unless the courts and the federal government mandate a tire recall, the manufacturers could also continue to sell the tires to more unwitting consumers.
All new cars sold in the United States (and many developed countries) now have airbags. These devices decrease the incidence of fatal and serious injuries in front-end collisions. Quite a few vehicles now have side airbags as well, adding passenger protection during airbags should deploy in single vehicle accidents where the driver hits a fixed object and collisions with other vehicles.
Unfortunately, it seems that these life-saving devices do not always work as designed. In fact, defective airbags fail to protect many drivers and their passengers or injure people when they deploy during a vehicle accident. If a defective airbag causes an injury to you and your loved ones, you need to talk to a personal injury attorney immediately.
Since 2000, on average 35,000 people died annually in auto accidents in the United States. Nearly one-third of these fatalities occurred due to rollovers. If the trend continues, by 2010, 350,000 people will have lost their lives, due to rollover accidents.
The average small city in the United Sates has a population of less than 500,000 people. In effect, the toll from rollovers is causing one small town to disappear every 10 years. The U.S. government's Fatality Accident Reporting System notes that the fatality rate for rollovers was nearly four times that of other vehicle accidents in 2007.
Consider a recently settled wrongful death lawsuit against the Denman Tire Corporation. The plaintiffs also named the tire distributor and the tire dealer as co-defendants in this tragic case. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, who lost their 4-year old daughter as result of a defective tire installed on a Chevy Blazer.
Few people expect to be harmed by companies that they trust. Even fewer people anticipate death from using consumer products. However, these types of cases occur with alarming regularity in our country.
The Centers for Disease Control estimates that as many as 5,000 people per year die from food-borne illnesses. Many of these deaths could have been prevented. They were mainly caused by poor safety and quality controls. Even though the Food and Drug Administration regularly inspects food processing plants, salmonella and other bacteria slip into the country's food supply without warning.
Personal injury lawyers and wrongful death attorneys can help you with minor accidents that cause you discomfort and pain. They also help clients whose lives have been destroyed by negligence or intentional acts that result in a loved one's death. Many victims of these kinds of damages fail to realize that they have a just cause against the responsible party or company.
People who have suffered from the wrongful death of a family member often tell themselves that no amount of monetary compensation will bring back their loved one. They are often in shock from the unexpected loss, but feel a need to move on instead of dwelling in the past. This is not the time to allow your own emotions to rule. The advice of a competent personal injury attorney can be crucial. Although your attorney is likely to be a compassionate person, he or she will be objective and much more conscious of the ramifications of the true consequences of your family's loss.
Banana Peels and
Hot Coffee Injuries
Slipping on a banana peel is a famous and hilarious comedy routine. It endured for years and even made it to TV comedy shows in the early years. There is usually a side reference to the injury suffered by the unsuspecting victim. Sometimes, you might even see a vignette in old television reruns about the consumer trying to get compensation for damages. We enjoy laughing at this vaudeville standard. If you are injured while shopping or eating a retail location, it is not a laughing matter! You will need a personal injury attorney right away.
Every year, consumers suffer personal injuries caused by defective products. In recent years, some of the most widely publicized cases involved everything from defective baby cribs, overheated laptops, and dealer installed SUV tires to exploding propane grills. It is not unheard of for consumers to die from injuries caused by defective products. In some cases, the company at fault discovers the defect and issues a recall before anyone is seriously injured. However, all too often, the opposite occurs.
In the United States, consumers have excellent legal remedies when they experience a loss due to product defects. However, every consumer should consult a personal injury attorney, as soon as an injury occurs. The laws of most states do not require that the injured person prove that the manufacturer was negligent. In most states, the consumer only has to prove that the product was defective. Sounds easy enough. Yet, this can be a tricky situation for consumers to navigate without assistance from a personal injury attorney
Exercise Your Civil Rights
Believe it or not, the government is not above the law. It doesn't matter what the old adage says or small you are, you can fight city hall. You will face a formidable foe! And the government will use our tax dollar to pay an army of lawyers who are usually already on their payroll. But does that mean you should give up your rights? No, not without talking to an attorney to find out how to proceed.
Ordinary citizens suffer both financial and personal injury when our government agencies do not exercise due diligence or fail to fulfill the public trust. If you have suffered an injury or loss as result of the malfunction of your government, you should never give up your right to recover without a fight. Of course, you will find an almost insurmountable mountain of red tape. And often, unless you are part of a sizeable group of injured persons, you may feel that your cause is hopeless.
Every day, it seems that pharmaceutical companies, agricultural producers and even pet food manufacturers neglect to take proper precautions to protect consumers from their products. If you are one of the lucky ones, you return your defective product or tainted food before you or a loved one are injured or worse.
If you don't get the recall notice in time or you have already been injured, you can take action against the company that's responsible. A personal injury attorney can help recover your losses.
Every state in the U.S. has laws and regulations for pet owners. The privilege of pet ownership comes with the responsibility of keeping the public safe from any harm from the animal. Thousands of innocent bystanders suffer injury from animal attacks annually. A dog most often causes these, although cats frequently injure people too.
You must take action to recover your losses from the pet's owner, if a vicious or uncontrollable pet attacks you or family members. Take legal action so that you do not have to suffer both physical injury and financial disaster when a pet owner fails to fulfill their responsibility to the larger community. A personal injury attorney can help you determine your rights and protect your interests.
Medical malpractice is usually an accident! Unfortunately, this type of accident can mean the difference between life and death. The human factor in medicine is unavoidable. People make mistakes, including your family doctor and medical facilities. The trauma of medical malpractice can have long-term physical and financial effects. You must seek advice from a qualified personal injury attorney, if you believe that you or a family member suffered a loss due to medical malpractice.
Most people trust their doctor's advice and follow their orders. After all, most physicians are caring professionals who have years of education. They must be certified by the state in which they practice and continue their education to improve their skills. Yet, the health care system is very prone to accidents and poor judgment about health problems; this includes both chronic and acute conditions.
Federal Assistance for Workplace Injuries
Hurt at work? There's nothing to worry about if your company provides worker's compensation insurance. Or is there? Workers' compensation insurance coverage is a right when you work for any company that meets the guidelines that the government in your state has set.
The laws that we rely on to protect workers in the workplace did not always exist. The workman's compensation legislation became law in the 20th century. Every state has the right to create regulations and guidelines for allowable claims, benefit limits, coverage rules and even attorney's fees. As you can see, even if you are covered, there are 50 different laws that will determine how your work-related accident claim gets resolved. The Federal Workers' Compensation laws provide similar coverage for federal employees.
Importance of Safety in Retirement Communities
Placing an aging parent in a nursing home is always a serious decision. Sometimes it may be necessary to place a loved one that is incapacitated in a facility that can provide better care than the family. Every family must consider the pros and cons of this decision and choose the best care option for the affected family member. However, no matter how wisely and deliberately you choose, you cannot avoid the reality of the perils that may await your loved ones in nursing homes.
Most nursing homes are licensed by the state in which they are located. In addition, they must meet certain standards in order to be eligible to bill Medicare or Medicaid for patient services. Some nursing homes do their job better than others do. Poorly managed nursing homes often have higher than average patient accidents. They may be understaffed or simply fail to schedule enough personnel to ensure the safety of frail, elderly residents. In some cases, the salaries paid to patient care workers are so low that it affects morale. That still is not justification for a nursing home's staff to allow its residents to be injured or neglected.
Even good drivers can have an auto accident. For many people, even a minor accident often becomes a confusing, frustrating experience. There is no way to know everything that you must do to protect yourself and your personal interests after an auto accident. Find a competent personal injury attorney to help you navigate the reams of paperwork and phone calls that you need to settle your accident damages claim. First, take time to consider the physical and financial consequences of an auto accident before you leave the scene.
Lung Conditions from Smoking
A while back a Florida jury ordered Philip Morris to pay $8 million to the widow of a smoker who died of lung cancer. The man, Stuart Hess, was a chain smoker for decades. Philip Morris said they would appeal. This was an important verdict, because it is the first of about 8,000 lawsuits which have been filed in Florida against the big tobacco companies.
During the trial, a video was shown of 1994 testimony before the U.S. Congress where top executives of the tobacco companies denied that smoking was addictive. Those statements have been long discredited by medical fact.
Every year hundreds of thousands of people are involved in auto accidents. Even with a relatively minor accident, the experience can leave you in shock and disoriented -- and often angry. The aftermath of a collision requires clear thinking under difficult circumstances.
I have prepared this article for you to print out and keep in your glove compartment PDF of this accident recovery article. I am offering you this checklist with the hope that that it may help prevent additional injuries, and equally importantly help you recover medical expenses and other costs in the event you need to pursue a personal injury lawsuit.
1. First of all, do your best to remain calm. Do not make any accusations against the other driver or passengers. The experience of being in an auto accident can easily result in an escalation of anger which can make the situation worse. And above all do not take blame for the accident even if you feel it was clearly your fault. I cannot emphasize this enough.
2. Keep an inexpensive emergency first aid kit in your glove compartment, with an assortment of bandages, ointments, and other medical supplies in case of injuries. Also include a notepad and pen, and an inexpensive camera. Included in your glove compartment should be addresses and phone numbers of your insurance company, your doctor, as well as any of your medical conditions that may be helpful to ambulance and other first responders.
At the Congressional hearings on bacteria-tainted peanut products, Representative Greg Walden, Republican of Oregon, showed a
jar of peanut butter to Stewart Parnell, owner of the Peanut Corporation of America. The jar was wrapped in "Crime Scene tape". Representative Walden invited Mr. Parnell to eat some of the peanut butter. Mr. Parnell declined to answer his request; invoking the protections afforded him under the U.S. Constitution.
Usually it takes the news media's spotlight on a serious injury or accident to get government bureaucracy to do their jobs. Also the reality of a potential costly personal injury lawsuit serves as a motivation for municipalities to take steps to reduce the possibility of injuries to its citizens.
Los Angeles's transit agency, the MTA is in the process of installing safety barriers on all light rail platforms to prevent people from accidentally walking between train cars. Last year the MTA purchased new rail cars that had gaps between the cars. At the time, the Federal Transit Administration, as part of its safety certification, raised concerns about the spaces between the cars.
Two-hundred million dollars might seem like a lot of money. But when it comes to train accidents, especially train accidents involving many victims 200 million does not go a long way. In the case of the Metrolink accident, where 25 people were killed and 135 injured, 200 million dollars divided between 145 people is unlikely to be enough to provide the victims and their families the money they need for a lifetime medical treatment, rehabilitation, lost wages, and the many other issues in an personal injury accident caused by the negligence of the Metrolink and their contractor who supply the Metrolink engineers.
The family of Nataline Sarkisyan filed a lawsuit against the Cigna health insurance company. You may recall the heart wrenching newspaper and TV news stories about a year ago about Cigna denying the 17 year old Los Angeles teenager a life-saving liver transplant. Cigna outrageously claimed that the procedure was experimental and continually denied her claim, even though the medical experts at UCLA Medical Center's Mattel Children's Hospital felt the transplant would be successful and beneficial to the young girl.
As the rainy season sneaks upon us, the increasing incidents of auto accidents resulting in serious personal injury are inevitable. As a personal injury lawyer I have seen the tragic results of injuries and wrongful deaths too often. So many of these tragedies could have been prevented if drivers were would adjust their driving during rainy conditions.
First there is the issue of visibility. Rain on your windshield reduces your view of the road ahead. It also compromises your peripheral vision as you do your best to see what is directly ahead.
It is reassuring that U.S. Senator Diane Feinstein is very much involved in improving the deplorable conditions that existed and currently exist in the Metrolink commuter train system.
I hope she continues to insist on true improvements and not just cosmetic, unsatisfactory minor fixes. Twenty-five people were killed in the Chattsworth crash, and scores seriously injured. Comprehensive safety changes need to be proposed, reviewed and implemented in a logical and technically feasible manner, without any bureaucratic delays and excuses.
It is a relief to know that there were apparently no fatalities from the recent Continental Airlines flight 1404 that crashed on takeoff. First of all, I want to join with the passengers in honoring the flight attendants who, according to the reports evacuated all of the passengers in the first seconds after the plane had skidded off the runway into a ravine, and caught fire.
While the investigation is still continuing as to the exact cause of the crash, I would like to address myself to the many questions regarding compensation to those who are involved in an airline crash.
First of all many people are not aware of certain limitations for those involved in a domestic airline crash. Therefore it is imperative to contact an aviation lawyer immediately to protect your rights.
Even if you are not injured in an aviation accident, just being a participant in a situation where you are emotionally traumatized because of eminent fear of death or injury, meansyour would most certainly be due compensation from those responsible for the accident.
By now we are all aware of the senseless Thanksgiving day tragedy when over 2,000 customers swarmed into the New York Wal-Mart store at 5 a.m., trampling employee Jdimytai Damour. News reports showed that the local law enforcement was reviewing the surveillance videos to try to determine if they could identify any of the shoppers who were responsible for Mr. Damour's death.
Ironically, it seems to me, that the law enforcement needed not to look at the videos, but would have better luck at finding who was at least partially responsible by looking in a mirror. Anyone who has viewed the pre-stampede videos of the Wal-Mart parking lot could see the huge crowd excitedly waiting for the exact second when they could rush the front doors. You can see by the above photo the relatively small entrance door of the Wal-Mart store. Early in the morning Nassau Country police officers visited the location and witnessed the growingly unruly crowd -- however the officers left a short time later. After the tragedy the police lamely explained that they could not be responsible for guarding a Wal-Mart -- asserting that it was the responsibility of the Wal-Mart security force.
In today's Los Angeles Times, there's an article about the Minnesota Interstate 35W bridge collapse, that occurred in August 2007. It was a tragedy that injured over 100 people and killed 13. The article concerned the testimony at the National Transportation Safety Board.
What was interesting to me about the article, as a lawyer who represents personal injury victims in Los Angeles, is how the people and companies clearly responsible for the disaster seem mainly concerned with covering their "assets" rather than sincerely trying to get to the real causes of the collapse. One of the primary purposes of hearings at the National Transportation Safety Board is to hopefully prevent future accidents. But obviously the attorneys for the responsible parties are advising the participants at the hearing. And that is inexcusable.
Here is one quote which particularly bothers me. Lawyers for Progressive Contractors Inc., the company that had been repaving the bridge issued a statement claiming the construction firm was not responsible for the collapse. "Given the problems with the gusset plates, it was only a matter of time before the bridge collapsed. PCI just happened to be there when it did," the lawyers' statement said."
The tragic death of a 11 year old girl in Glendale has lessons for us all. For those who are not aware of the accident, Meri Nalbandyan, a 6th grader from Glendale's Eleanor J. Toll Middle School, was struck by a Sports Utility Vehicle. She was killed in front of her mother and classmates.
It is unfortunate that it took a devastating tragedy to bring to light the serious shortcomings of the commuter rail's mismanagement by Metrolink's Board of Directors. As a Los Angeles personal injury attorney, I find it hard to believe that there would not be a policy in place that engineers cannot be text messaging while operating the trains. However, based on what I read in a recent Los Angeles Times article not one Metrolink board member rides the rails regularly.
According to the article, only board member Art Brown rides the Metrolink -- just 7 to 10 times a month. Those who do not ride the Metrolink claim to have good reasons. For example, Los Angeles County Supervisors Mike Antonovich has this excuse -- he says he must travel throughout his far-flung district, which covers much of northern Los Angeles County, explaining "If I worked in a stationary workplace and I had a normal schedule, I could take public transportation there and back."